The Turner Prize isn’t the only thing putting the art world in a spin this week, oh no; there’s also the matter of whether or not Team Tate will opt to extend their 21-year partnership with sponsors BP. Having first struck a deal with Tate Britain in 1990, the oil giant today spends over £1m each year on the Tate network of art spaces, and a number of other galleries, museums and arts institutions across the UK.
It seems, though, in this increasingly eco-aware age, and no doubt with the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf Of Mexico still very in much in everyone’s minds, that a significant portion of the Tate’s members and visitors would rather do without BP’s help, thank you very much, after 8000 of them signed an open letter urging Tate Trustees against renewing the sponsorship deal.
There has also been dissent amongst the top Tate ranks, with trustee Patrick Brill criticising BP’s environmental record and branding the company a “disgrace”. Tate Director Nicholas Serota, presumably torn between wider public opinion and a need for funds, has acknowledged that the Trustees’ decision will be “very difficult”. Well he’s got that right, at least.
With a decision due from the Tate board any day now, Chris Sands of Liberate Tate, one of a number of organisations behind the aforementioned petition, has this to say: “Tate can no longer respond by simply stating that BP is an important sponsor of the arts. Tate’s visiting public and its own members are saying in large numbers that maintaining a relationship with an oil company like BP is harming both the reputation of Tate and the experience of enjoying great art in a public gallery”.
Tags: BP, Nicholas Serota, Tate BritainSections: Brands - News - Visual Art | No Comments


